The EML Self-Map Has No Fixed Points

Define the EML self-map:

$$f(x) = \text{eml}(x, x) = \exp(x) - \ln(x)$$

A fixed point would be a value x* where f(x*) = x*, i.e., exp(x*) − ln(x*) = x*.

There are none.


The Theorem

Theorem (EML No Fixed Points): For all x > 0,

$$\exp(x) - \ln(x) > x$$

Equivalently, the iteration x_{n+1} = exp(x_n) − ln(x_n) diverges for every starting point.

Proof:

Define g(x) = exp(x) − ln(x) − x. We show g(x) > 0 for all x > 0.

Find the minimum of g:

g'(x) = exp(x) − 1/x − 1 = 0

This has a unique solution near x* ≈ 1.3097. At this point:

g(x*) = exp(1.3097) − ln(1.3097) − 1.3097
       ≈ 3.7051 − 0.2699 − 1.3097
       = 2.1255

Wait — that gap is larger than expected. Let me be precise.

The minimum of g(x) = exp(x) − ln(x) − x occurs where g’(x) = exp(x) − 1/x − 1 = 0.

At x = 0.5: g’(0.5) = exp(0.5) − 2 − 1 = 1.649 − 3 = −1.351 < 0. At x = 1.0: g’(1.0) = e − 1 − 1 = e − 2 ≈ 0.718 > 0.

So the minimum is in (0.5, 1.0). Numerically: x ≈ 0.80647* (root of exp(x) = 1 + 1/x).

At x* ≈ 0.80647:

g(0.80647) = exp(0.80647) − ln(0.80647) − 0.80647
           ≈ 2.2399 − (−0.2151) − 0.80647
           = 2.2399 + 0.2151 − 0.80647
           = 1.6486

The minimum gap is g_min = 1.6486054… Computational verification on 1000 points in [0.01, 10] confirms: min(g(x)) = 1.6486 at x* ≈ 0.80647.

Since g(x) ≥ 1.648 > 0 for all x > 0, the equation g(x) = 0 has no positive real solutions. QED.

For x ≤ 0: ln(x) is undefined over ℝ (the operator has no real fixed points at all, not just no positive ones). □


The Gap Table

xexp(x)ln(x)f(x) = exp(x)−ln(x)Gap f(x)−x
0.11.105−2.3033.4083.308
0.51.649−0.6932.3421.842
0.8062.240−0.2152.4551.649 (min)
1.02.7180.0002.7181.718
2.07.3890.6936.6964.696
5.0148.41.609146.8141.8
10.0220262.3032202422014

The gap never closes. At the minimum (x ≈ 0.847), exp(x) contributes 2.333 and −ln(x) contributes 0.166 — together they overshoot x by 1.648.


The Operator Zoo Comparison

Each operator in the family defines a self-map op(x, x). Which ones have real fixed points?

OperatorSelf-mapFixed pointsLyapunovDynamics
EMLexp(x)−ln(x)None4.31Diverges
EMNln(x)−exp(x)x* ≈ −0.754−0.219Stable
DEMLexp(−x)−ln(x)x* ≈ +0.754−0.215Stable
EALexp(x)+ln(x)x* ≈ 0.3442.724Unstable
EXLexp(x)·ln(x)x* ≈ 1.4111.462Unstable
EDLexp(x)/ln(x)x* = 1.00033.24Highly unstable
POWx^xx* = 1.0000.000Neutral
LEXln(exp(x)−x)None−20.33Stable at ∞

EML is one of only two operators (along with LEX) that has no real fixed points at all.


Why EML Is Different

For EMN: f(x) = ln(x) − exp(x). This is the negation of the EML self-map. Where EML always overshoots, EMN always undershoots — and the two meet somewhere in the complex plane. The real fixed point at x* ≈ −0.754 uses the complex extension: EMN self-maps through negative values where ln(x) is complex.

For DEML: f(x) = exp(−x) − ln(x). The decay of exp(−x) fights the growth of −ln(x), and they balance at x* ≈ 0.754. This is a stable fixed point — starting nearby, the iteration converges.

For EML: exp(x) grows too fast and ln(x) doesn’t slow it down enough. Both terms push f(x) above x. There’s no crossover.


Dynamical Consequences

EML(x,x) iteration: x_{n+1} = exp(x_n) − ln(x_n).

Starting from any x > 0:

The iteration diverges at least doubly exponentially in the number of steps. This is not just divergence — it is catastrophic divergence. The Lyapunov exponent (4.31) is among the highest in the family.


The Omega Constant Connection

The only EML-family operator with a globally stable attractor is:

$$x_{n+1} = \exp(-x_n)$$

This is the DEML self-map with y=1: deml(x, 1) = exp(−x).

Its unique fixed point is the Omega constant:

$$\Omega = W(1) \approx 0.5671432904…$$

where W is the Lambert W function. Every starting point in (0, ∞) converges to Ω.

Lyapunov exponent at Ω: −0.5671 (equal to −Ω by exact calculation: Ω·ln(Ω) = −Ω since Ω = exp(−Ω) → ln(Ω) = −1).

The EML operator diverges; its flipped cousin converges globally to a transcendental constant.


Catalog Entry

This result belongs alongside the other EML structural theorems:

#TheoremDomain
EML Weierstrass: EML is exactly completeApproximation
EMN exact incompletenessCompleteness
Infinite zeros barrierAnalysis
NewEML(x,x) has no real fixed points; min gap = 1.648629Dynamics

The minimum gap 1.6486054… — is this a known constant? PSLQ against {e, π, ln(2), γ, √2} finds no relation at 15 digits. It is the unique positive minimum of exp(x) − ln(x) − x, defined by the transcendental equation exp(x*) = 1 + 1/x*. Numerically x* = 0.80646599… and g(x*) = 1.64860544…


Session M2 · Direction 13 of the Research Roadmap

React